Good shape overall. A few tweaks would push it into the top tier.

Documentation

78

Install and run instructions9pt45

README documents how to install the project.

Contributing guide5pt85

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

README12pt90

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under CC-BY-4.0.

Engineering

80

Reproducibility6pt0

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

Commit Package.resolved for application projects so Swift Package Manager resolves the same versions.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (PulseLoopTests/ActivityServiceTests.swift).

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.swiftlint.yml).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

53

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt40

No repository description set on GitHub (−60 pts).

Add a one-line description in the repo Settings → About. It appears in search results and social previews.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 31
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • Community health
  • authors own >50% of commits
  • 233
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 1d 24h
    Median issue response
  • 1d 16h
    Median PR merge time
  • 9
    Open issues
Repository files15 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • docs
  • PulseLoop
  • PulseLoop.xcodeproj
  • PulseLoopLiveActivity
  • PulseLoopTests
    Good: Test files detected (PulseLoopTests/ActivityServiceTests.swift).
  • screenshots
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .swiftlint.yml
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.swiftlint.yml).
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • icon-source.svg
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under CC-BY-4.0.
  • PulseLoopLiveActivityExtension.entitlements
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.