getsentry/sentry-cocoa
Grade a repo

0

/ 100

GradeB

A well-known project done right. Strong docs and solid engineering throughout.

Top 18% of 5,156 graded repos

The official Sentry SDK for iOS, tvOS, macOS, watchOS, iPadOS and visionOS.

Documentation81
Engineering85
Health100
Swift1,088MIT1mo ago

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

9 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.

  3. 3
    CI/CD14pt

    Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.

  4. 4
    CI/CD14pt

    Upload coverage to Codecov, Coveralls, or report it with `--coverage` flags.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

81

Install and run instructions9pt45

README documents how to install the project.

Contributing guide5pt80

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

85

CI/CD14pt72

CI is configured (.github/workflows/build-sentryobjc-slices.yml).

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (3rd-party-integrations/SentryCocoaLumberjack/Tests).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).

Reproducibility6pt100

Lockfile present (Gemfile.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 398
    Forks
  • 439
    Releaseslatest 9y ago

Community

  • -
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 1,088
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 7h
    Median issue response
  • 3h
    Median PR merge time
  • 383
    Open issues
Repository files68 root entries
  • .claude
  • .codex
  • .cursor
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/build-sentryobjc-slices.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 4 ecosystems (bundler, github-actions, swift, swift). Dependencies stay current.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • .sauce
  • .vscode
  • .xcodebuildmcp
  • 3rd-party-integrations
    Good: Test files detected (3rd-party-integrations/SentryCocoaLumberjack/Tests).
  • develop-docs
  • docs
  • fastlane
  • Plans
  • Samples
  • schema
  • scripts
  • Sentry.xcodeproj
  • Sentry.xcworkspace
  • SentryTestUtils
  • SentryTestUtilsDynamic
  • SentryTestUtilsTests
  • Sources
  • SwiftConversion
  • test-server
  • Tests
  • TestSamples
  • Utils
  • .clang-format
  • .craft.yml
  • .editorconfig
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
  • .git-blame-ignore-revs
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .mcp.json
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml
  • .ruby-version
    Good: Environment pinned via .ruby-version.
  • .spi.yml
  • .swiftlint.yml
  • AGENTS.md
  • agents.toml
  • Brewfile
  • Brewfile-ci-build
  • Brewfile-ci-format
  • BUGBOT.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • dprint.json
  • Gemfile
    Good: Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).
  • Gemfile.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (Gemfile.lock). Installs are reproducible.
  • LICENSE.md
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • Makefile
  • MIGRATION.md
  • Package.swift
  • Package@swift-6.1.swift
  • Package@swift-6.2.swift
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • REVIEWS.md
  • sdk_api_objc_v10.diff.json
  • sdk_api_objc_v10.json
  • sdk_api_objc.diff.json
  • sdk_api_objc.json
  • sdk_api_sentryswiftui.json
  • sdk_api_v10.json
  • sdk_api.json
  • Sentry.podspec
  • SentrySwiftUI.podspec
  • SentryTests-Info.plist
  • THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/getsentry/sentry-cocoa)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/getsentry/sentry-cocoa)

More graded Swift repos