jazzyalex/agent-sessions
Grade a repo

0

/ 100

GradeD

Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.

Top 49% of 5,156 graded repos

Local-first macOS app to browse, search, analyze, and resume supported AI coding-agent session history across Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, Cursor Agent, Hermes, OpenClaw, Copilot CLI, and more.

Documentation83
Engineering56
Health68
Swift656MIT1mo ago

A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code

Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to C (79).

See your top fixes
Now
D
67
Potential
C
79

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

18 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.

  3. 3
    CI/CD14pt

    Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.

  4. 4
    CI/CD14pt

    Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

83

Contributing guide5pt55

CONTRIBUTING guide is very brief (−12 pts for depth). 150+ words earns +6 pts; 400+ earns +12 pts.

→ Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

README12pt80

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

56

Reproducibility6pt0

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

→ Commit Package.resolved for application projects so Swift Package Manager resolves the same versions.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (AgentSessionsLogicTests/DroidSessionParserLogicTests.swift).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.swiftlint.yml).

Project health

68

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 43
    Forks
  • 64
    Releaseslatest 9mo ago

Community

  • -
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 656
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 1d 3h
    Median issue response
  • 1d 15h
    Median PR merge time
  • 1
    Open issues
Repository files27 root entries
  • .claude
  • .codex
  • .git-tools
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
  • .superpowers
  • AgentSessions
  • AgentSessions.xcodeproj
  • AgentSessionsLogicTests
    Good: Test files detected (AgentSessionsLogicTests/DroidSessionParserLogicTests.swift).
  • AgentSessionsTests
  • CX-AS-Note
  • docs
    Issue: CONTRIBUTING guide is very brief (−12 pts for depth). 150+ words earns +6 pts; 400+ earns +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • Marketing
  • Resources
  • scripts
  • side-chat-probes-tmp
  • skills
  • tools
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .mailmap
  • .swiftlint.yml
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.swiftlint.yml).
  • agents.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • GEMINI.md
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Issue: No live demo link in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Link to a deployed version, docs site, or demo video. Users want to see it running.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • SECURITY.md
    Good: Security policy present.
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/jazzyalex/agent-sessions)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/jazzyalex/agent-sessions)

More graded Swift repos