61

/ 100

GradeD

Strong community interest, but tests, CI, or docs need work.

Higher than 45% of 5,156 graded repos

Unified KV Cache Compression Methods for Auto-Regressive Models

A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code

Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to B (80).

See your top fixes
Now
D
61
Potential
B
80

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

12 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.

  3. 3
    README12pt

    Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.

  4. 4
    Install and run instructions9pt

    Add a .env.example listing all required environment variables so contributors know what to set up.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

78

Contributing guide5pt0

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

README12pt90

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

38

CI/CD14pt0

No CI configuration detected in this repository.

If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt70

Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (tests).

Project health

94

Housekeeping3pt60

.gitignore present.

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • 21 / 21
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 174
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • 42% - Weak
    Community health
  • 2 bus factor
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 1,349
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 3h
    Median issue response
  • 1d 24h
    Median PR merge time
  • 2
    Open issues
Repository files21 root entries
  • assets
  • csrc
  • data
  • docs
  • examples
  • figs
  • pyramidkv
  • scripts
  • tests
    Good: Test files detected (tests).
  • .DS_Store
    Issue: Build artifacts or local files may be committed (.DS_Store) (−40 pts).Fix: Remove them and add to .gitignore.
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • eval_ruler.py
  • eval.py
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • metrics.py
  • README_zh.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • README.md
  • requirements.txt
    Good: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
    Good: Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
  • run_longbench.py
  • run_needle_in_haystack.py
  • run_ruler.py
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/zefan-cai/kvcache-factory)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/zefan-cai/kvcache-factory)

More graded Python repos