0
/ 100
Good community traction and solid fundamentals. Nearly in the top tier.
ESB, SOA, REST, APIs and Cloud Integrations in Python
Top fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.
- 2CI/CD14pt
Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.
- 3CI/CD14pt
Add `pull_request:` to the workflow `on:` triggers.
- 4CI/CD14pt
Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
76
README documents how to install the project.
CONTRIBUTING guide found.
README is present.
Licensed under AGPL-3.0.
Engineering
60
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/zato-compile.yml).
Lockfile present (code/requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
Test files detected (code/tests).
Linter or formatter configured (code/ruff.toml).
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 252Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- -Community health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 1,010Watchers
Responsiveness
- -Median issue response
- 22hMedian PR merge time
- 0Open issues
Repository files8 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/zato-compile.yml).
- codeGood: CONTRIBUTING guide found.Issue: CONTRIBUTING guide contents could not be read (−28 pts vs a readable file).Fix: Move the file to the repo root or docs/CONTRIBUTING.md so its setup, style, test, and PR sections can be graded.Good: Test files detected (code/tests).Good: Linter or formatter configured (code/ruff.toml).Good: Lockfile present (code/requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .post-commit.sh
- LICENSE.txtGood: Licensed under AGPL-3.0.
- Makefile
- pyproject.tomlGood: Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Good: README documents how to install the project.Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/zatosource/zato)