0
/ 100
Good shape overall. A few tweaks would push it into the top tier.
Full Education Management System.
Top fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.
- 2CI/CD14pt
Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.
- 3CI/CD14pt
Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.
- 4README12pt
Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
83
Contributing guidance is in the README, not a dedicated CONTRIBUTING.md (−20 pts).
→ Moving it to a CONTRIBUTING.md makes it easier to find and keeps the README focused. A dedicated file earns +47 pts base.
README is present.
README documents how to install the project.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
72
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
Lockfile present (Web/package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
Test files detected (Legacy/Tests).
CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.cd.yml).
.NET formatting configured (Web/.editorconfig).
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (Back/Back.csproj).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 30Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- -Community health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 234Watchers
Responsiveness
- 108d 10hMedian issue response
- 2hMedian PR merge time
- 41Open issues
Repository files25 root entries
- .claude
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.cd.yml).
- .vscode
- BackGood: Dependency manifest found (Back/Back.csproj).
- Docs
- LegacyGood: Test files detected (Legacy/Tests).
- Mocks
- Posts
- Tests
- WebGood: .NET formatting configured (Web/.editorconfig).Good: Lockfile present (Web/package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- Caddyfile
- CLAUDE.md
- Dockerfile.back
- Dockerfile.caddy
- Dockerfile.web
- Features.md
- global.json
- Infra.md
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- nuget.config
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- Roadmap.md
- SYKI.slnx
- TODOS.md
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/zaqueucavalcante/syki)