67
/ 100
Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.
Official repository for Video Hub App
A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code
Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to A (94).
See your top fixesTop fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
- 2CI/CD14pt
Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.
- 3CI/CD14pt
Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.
- 4CI/CD14pt
Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
77
Contributing guidance is in the README, not a dedicated CONTRIBUTING.md (−20 pts).
→ Moving it to a CONTRIBUTING.md makes it easier to find and keeps the README focused. A dedicated file earns +47 pts base.
README is present.
README documents how to install the project.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
49
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml).
Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
Issue or PR templates present.
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (package.json).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- 53 / 53Commits (30d / 90d)
- 204Forks
- 8Releaseslatest 3y ago
Community
- 85% - GoodCommunity health
- 1 bus factorlowauthor own >50% of commits
- 704Watchers
Responsiveness
- 20hMedian issue response
- 19hMedian PR merge time
- 137Open issues
Repository files28 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml).Good: Issue or PR templates present.
- .vscode
- bin
- build
- demo
- i18n
- interfaces
- node
- remote
- src
- .editorconfigGood: Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
- .eslintrc.json
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .nvmrcGood: Environment pinned via .nvmrc.
- .stylelintrc
- angular.json
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdGood: Code of conduct present.
- electron-builder.json
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- main.ts
- package-lock.jsonGood: Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
- package.jsonGood: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- SECURITY.mdGood: Security policy present.
- tsconfig-serve.json
- tsconfig.base.json
- tsconfig.json
- tsconfig.worker.json
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/whyboris/video-hub-app)