62

/ 100

GradeD

A workable base with real gaps. Start with design docs and a bill of materials.

Top 49% of 5,156 graded repos

.NET BMW and VAG Ediabas interpreter library

A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code

Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to B (82).

See your top fixes
Now
D
67
Potential
B
82

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

12 to address
  1. 1
    Design documentation15pt

    Add a DESIGN_NOTES.md (or theory-of-operation doc) explaining the circuit design, component choices, and calculations.

  2. 2
    README12pt

    Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.

  3. 3
    README12pt

    Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.

  4. 4
    Editable design sources12pt

    Commit the project file (.kicad_pro, .PrjPcb) so the schematic and layout open together as one project.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

74

Build and fabrication9pt50

No fabrication or ordering instructions in the README (−50 pts).

→ Add a section on how to get the board made: export gerbers, order from a fab (JLCPCB, PCBWay, OSH Park), and use the BOM.

README12pt75

README is present.

Contributing guide5pt83

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

→ Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

License6pt100

Licensed under GPL-3.0.

Engineering

51

Issue and PR templates4pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

BOM and manufacturability8pt30

No bill of materials found (−50 pts).

→ Export a BOM (CSV/spreadsheet) with reference designators, quantities, values, and manufacturer part numbers so the board can actually be sourced.

Design documentation15pt45

No dedicated design documentation found (−55 pts).

→ Add a DESIGN_NOTES.md (or theory-of-operation doc) explaining the circuit design, component choices, and calculations.

Editable design sources12pt90

Editable schematic source is committed (not just an image).

Project health

100

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • 205 / 811
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 226
    Forks
  • 48
    Releaseslatest 8y ago

Community

  • 71% - Fair
    Community health
  • 1 bus factorlow
    author own >50% of commits
  • 950
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • <1h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 0
    Open issues
Repository files11 root entries
  • .github
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • BmwDeepObd
    Good: Schematic or diagram visuals are included.
  • docs
  • EdiabasLib
    Good: Licensed under GPL-3.0.
  • Tools
  • .gitignore
  • .gitmodules
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • license.md
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Issue: No fabrication or ordering instructions in the README (−50 pts).Fix: Add a section on how to get the board made: export gerbers, order from a fab (JLCPCB, PCBWay, OSH Park), and use the BOM.
    Good: README explains how to assemble, wire up, or flash the hardware.
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/uholeschak/ediabaslib)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/uholeschak/ediabaslib)

More graded C# repos