0
/ 100
A workable base with real gaps. Start with the README and a license.
A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code
Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to C (74).
See your top fixesTop fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.
- 2CI/CD14pt
Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.
- 3CI/CD14pt
Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.
- 4CI/CD14pt
Upload coverage to Codecov, Coveralls, or report it with `--coverage` flags.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
47
No license detected.
→ Add a LICENSE file. Without one, nobody can legally use, copy, or contribute to your code.
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README is present.
README documents how to install the project.
Engineering
63
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
Test files detected (frontend/tests).
Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
Project health
84
No repository description set on GitHub (−60 pts).
→ Add a one-line description in the repo Settings → About. It appears in search results and social previews.
Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 0Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- 14% - WeakCommunity health
- 1 bus factorlowauthor own >50% of commits
- 1Watchers
Responsiveness
- -Median issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 0Open issues
Repository files26 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
- alembic
- core
- data
- database
- embedding
- evals
- frontendGood: Test files detected (frontend/tests).
- rag
- routers
- schemas
- services
- tests
- .dockerignore
- .env.example
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .python-version
- alembic.ini
- compose.prod.yml
- compose.yml
- DockerfileGood: Environment pinned via Dockerfile.
- eval_deepeval.py
- eval_ragas.py
- main.py
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Issue: No screenshots or images in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.Good: README has code examples.Issue: No live demo link in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Link to a deployed version, docs site, or demo video. Users want to see it running.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- requirements.txtGood: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.Good: Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/tutu99999/hanoi-food-agentic-rag)