Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.

Audio visualizer based on CAVA

Documentation

90

Contributing guide5pt71

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt93

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under GPL-3.0.

Engineering

24

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Reproducibility6pt0

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

Commit poetry.lock, uv.lock, pdm.lock, Pipfile.lock, conda-lock.yml, or another lockfile for your Python dependency manager.

CI/CD14pt40

CI is configured (.github/workflows/github_metrics.yml).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

68

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 11
    Forks
  • 8
    Releaseslatest 10mo ago

Community

  • Community health
  • authors own >50% of commits
  • 212
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 2d 12h
    Median issue response
  • 3d 20h
    Median PR merge time
  • 11
    Open issues
Repository files24 root entries
  • .github
    Good: Code of conduct present.
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/github_metrics.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • assets
  • aur
  • lang
  • scripts
  • snap
  • src
  • utils
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .gitmodules
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.md
  • AUTHORS.md
  • cavasik.doap
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CITATION.cff
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • CONTRIBUTORS.md
  • io.github.TheWisker.Cavasik.json
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under GPL-3.0.
  • meson.build
  • meson.options
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Issue: README has some structure (−7 pts). 2-3 headings earns partial credit; 4+ earns the full +15 pts.Fix: Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • shared-modules
  • SUPPORT.md