69

/ 100

GradeD

Getting some notice. Tests and CI would be the fastest wins.

Top 47% of 5,156 graded repos

Open source code snippet organizer for developers

A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code

Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to B (86).

See your top fixes
Now
D
69
Potential
B
86

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

18 to address
  1. 1
    CI/CD14pt

    Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.

  3. 3
    README12pt

    Expand with a description, install steps, usage, and examples.

  4. 4
    README12pt

    Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

44

Install and run instructions9pt0

No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).

Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

Contributing guide5pt0

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

README12pt68

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

78

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

CI/CD14pt72

CI is configured (.github/workflows/test.yml).

Reproducibility6pt82

Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (src/app/app.component.spec.ts).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).

Project health

89

Dependency manifest6pt65

Dependency manifest found (package.json).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 19
    Forks
  • 18
    Releaseslatest 3y ago

Community

  • 37% - Weak
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 62
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 939d 17h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 31
    Open issues
Repository files16 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/test.yml).
    Good: Dependabot configured for npm.
  • e2e
  • helpers
  • src
    Good: Test files detected (src/app/app.component.spec.ts).
  • .editorconfig
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
  • .eslintrc.json
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .prettierrc
  • angular.json
  • karma.conf.js
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • package-lock.json
    Good: Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
  • package.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
  • protractor.conf.js
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Issue: README is fairly short (−10 pts). At 400+ chars you get partial credit; 1,500+ earns the full +20 pts.Fix: Expand with a description, install steps, usage, and examples.
    Issue: README has some structure (−7 pts). 2-3 headings earns partial credit; 4+ earns the full +15 pts.Fix: Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • tsconfig.json
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/snypy/snypy-frontend)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/snypy/snypy-frontend)

More graded TypeScript repos