simple-icons/simple-icons-website-rs
Grade a repo

0

/ 100

GradeB

Well engineered for its size. A portfolio piece worth showing off.

Top 14% of 5,156 graded repos

The Simple Icons website: SVG icons for popular brands

Documentation74
Engineering98
Health92
Rust88CC0-1.01mo ago

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

11 to address
  1. 1
    README12pt

    Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.

  2. 2
    README12pt

    Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.

  3. 3
    Install and run instructions9pt

    Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

  4. 4
    Install and run instructions9pt

    Add a .env.example listing all required environment variables so contributors know what to set up.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

74

Install and run instructions9pt45

No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).

→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

README12pt78

README is present.

Contributing guide5pt84

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

License6pt100

Licensed under CC0-1.0.

Engineering

98

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (Cargo.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (tests).

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/verify.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

92

Dependency manifest6pt75

Dependency manifest found (Cargo.toml).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 19
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • -
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 88
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 4h
    Median issue response
  • 1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 9
    Open issues
Repository files31 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/verify.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • .husky
  • .vscode
  • app
  • components
  • libs
  • patches
  • scripts
  • tests
    Good: Test files detected (tests).
  • .editorconfig
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .node-version
    Good: Environment pinned via .node-version.
  • .npmrc
  • .nvmrc
  • .prettierignore
  • .prettierrc.json
  • .stylelintrc.json
  • Cargo.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (Cargo.lock). Installs are reproducible.
  • Cargo.toml
    Good: Dependency manifest found (Cargo.toml).
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a PR workflow section (−8 pts).Fix: Explain how to fork, branch, and open a pull request so contributors know what to expect.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • license.txt
    Good: Licensed under CC0-1.0.
  • Makefile.toml
  • package-lock.json
  • package.json
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Issue: README has some structure (−7 pts). 2-3 headings earns partial credit; 4+ earns the full +15 pts.Fix: Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • rust-toolchain.toml
  • rustfmt.toml
  • tsconfig.json
  • USAGE.md
  • xo.config.ts
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/simple-icons/simple-icons-website-rs)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/simple-icons/simple-icons-website-rs)

More graded Rust repos