Good shape overall. A few tweaks would push it into the top tier.
Turn human SOPs into deterministic, gated agentic workflows — a Claude Code plugin.
Documentation
82
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README documents how to install the project.
README is present.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
54
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
Lockfile present (plugins/agentic-sop-kit/kit/requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
Test files detected (plugins/agentic-sop-kit/kit/tests).
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (plugins/agentic-sop-kit/kit/requirements.txt).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- 111 / 111Commits (30d / 90d)
- 19Forks
- 9Releaseslatest 1d ago
Community
- 57% - FairCommunity health
- 1 bus factorlowauthor own >50% of commits
- 192Watchers
Responsiveness
- —Median issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 0Open issues
Repository files10 root entries
- .claude-plugin
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
- assets
- pluginsGood: Test files detected (plugins/agentic-sop-kit/kit/tests).Good: Lockfile present (plugins/agentic-sop-kit/kit/requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.Good: Dependency manifest found (plugins/agentic-sop-kit/kit/requirements.txt).
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- CHANGELOG.md
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- NOTICE
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- SECURITY.mdGood: Security policy present.