95

/ 100

GradeA

Excellent work. The main thing left to polish is a contributing guide.

Top 6% of 5,156 graded repos

Facilitating high-level interactions between Wasm modules and JavaScript

Rust9,105Apache-2.03d ago

Outstanding. A score of 95/100 puts this repo in a very small tier of truly well-engineered projects.

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

10 to address
  1. 1
    Install and run instructions9pt

    Add a .env.example listing all required environment variables so contributors know what to set up.

  2. 2
    Reproducibility6pt

    If this crate also ships a binary, commit Cargo.lock. For pure library crates, omitting it is recommended per the Cargo guide.

  3. 3
    Reproducibility6pt

    Add a Dockerfile, .nvmrc, or .python-version to pin the runtime version and make the environment reproducible.

  4. 4
    Dependency manifest6pt

    Add a `keywords = [...]` array to [package] to help people find the crate on crates.io.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

91

Contributing guide5pt61

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under Apache-2.0.

Engineering

97

Reproducibility6pt75

No Cargo.lock committed (correct for Rust library crates; the ecosystem convention is to omit it for libraries).

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (crates/cli-support/src/transforms/externref/tests).

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/main.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Rust linting configured (cargo clippy in CI, cargo fmt in CI).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

98

Dependency manifest6pt95

Dependency manifest found (Cargo.toml).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 1,226
    Forks
  • 129
    Releaseslatest 8y ago

Community

  • 62% - Fair
    Community health
  • 3 bus factor
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 9,105
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 1h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 566
    Open issues
Repository files26 root entries
  • .cargo
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/main.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (cargo, github-actions). Dependencies stay current.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • .vscode
  • benches
  • benchmarks
  • crates
    Good: Test files detected (crates/cli-support/src/transforms/externref/tests).
  • examples
  • guide
  • releases
  • src
  • tests
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • build.rs
  • Cargo.toml
    Good: Dependency manifest found (Cargo.toml).
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • clippy.toml
  • codecov.yml
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a PR workflow section (−8 pts).Fix: Explain how to fork, branch, and open a pull request so contributors know what to expect.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • justfile
  • LICENSE-APACHE
  • LICENSE-MIT
  • publish.rs
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • rust-analyzer.toml
  • taplo.toml
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/rustwasm/wasm-bindgen)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/rustwasm/wasm-bindgen)

More graded Rust repos