rasa/scoop-directory
Grade a repo

0

/ 100

GradeF

Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.

A searchable directory of buckets for the scoop package manager for Windows

Documentation63
Engineering38
Health86
Python931MITtoday

Documentation

63

Contributing guide5pt0

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

Install and run instructions9pt45

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt85

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

38

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/linter.yml).

Reproducibility6pt90

Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).

Project health

86

Dependency manifest6pt55

Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 79
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • -
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 931
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 12h
    Median issue response
  • 1d 2h
    Median PR merge time
  • 21
    Open issues
Repository files26 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/linter.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (pip, github-actions). Dependencies stay current.
  • maintenance
  • vendor
  • _config.yml
  • .editorconfig
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .textlintignore
  • appveyor.yml
  • by-apps.md
  • by-bucket.md
  • by-date-updated.md
  • by-forks.md
  • by-score.md
  • by-stars.md
  • exclude.txt
  • exclude.txt.orig
  • favicon.ico
  • include.txt
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • Makefile
  • pyproject.toml
    Good: Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • requirements.txt
    Good: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
  • scoop_directory.db
  • search.html