r-dbi/rsqlite

0

/ 100

Documentation94
Engineering58
Health68
R338LGPL-2.11d ago
Grade a repo

Good shape overall. A few tweaks would push it into the top tier.

R interface for SQLite

Documentation

94

Contributing guide5pt77

CONTRIBUTING guide found.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under LGPL-2.1.

Engineering

58

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Reproducibility6pt0

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/R-CMD-check-dev.yaml).

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (tests).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

68

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 85
    Forks
  • 53
    Releaseslatest 6y ago

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 338
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 298d 19h
    Median issue response
  • 11h
    Median PR merge time
  • 30
    Open issues
Repository files33 root entries
  • .aspell
  • .github
    Good: CONTRIBUTING guide found.
    Issue: CONTRIBUTING guide contents could not be read (−28 pts vs a readable file).Fix: Move the file to the repo root or docs/CONTRIBUTING.md so its setup, style, test, and PR sections can be graded.
    Good: Code of conduct present.
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/R-CMD-check-dev.yaml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
    Good: Security policy present.
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • data-raw
  • inst
  • man
  • patch
  • R
  • revdep
  • src
  • tests
    Good: Test files detected (tests).
  • vignettes
  • _pkgdown.yml
  • .clang-format
  • .cproject
  • .gitignore
  • .gitpod.yml
  • .Rbuildignore
  • cleanup
  • cleanup.ucrt
  • cleanup.win
  • CMakeLists.txt
  • codecov.yml
  • configure
  • configure.win
  • cran-comments.md
  • DESCRIPTION
  • LICENSE.md
    Good: Licensed under LGPL-2.1.
  • NAMESPACE
  • NEWS.md
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • README.Rmd
  • RSQLite.Rproj
  • UPDATE.md