85

/ 100

GradeB

A top-tier open source project. Docs, tests, and CI are all in excellent shape.

Top 18% of 5,156 graded repos

⚓ A collection of high-performance JavaScript tools.

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

15 to address
  1. 1
    README12pt

    Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.

  2. 2
    Install and run instructions9pt

    Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

  3. 3
    Install and run instructions9pt

    Add a .env.example listing all required environment variables so contributors know what to set up.

  4. 4
    Reproducibility6pt

    Add .github/dependabot.yml with at least one package-ecosystem entry so dependencies are updated automatically.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

72

Install and run instructions9pt45

No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).

Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

Contributing guide5pt58

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

README12pt85

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

98

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (Cargo.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (apps/oxfmt/test).

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

83

Housekeeping3pt60

.gitignore present.

Dependency manifest6pt65

Dependency manifest found (Cargo.toml).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • 804 / 2433
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 1,115
    Forks
  • 255
    Releaseslatest 3y ago

Community

  • 100% - Good
    Community health
  • 3 bus factor
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 21,890
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 5h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 644
    Open issues
Repository files43 root entries
  • .agents
  • .cargo
  • .devcontainer
    Good: Environment pinned via .devcontainer/Dockerfile.
  • .github
    Good: Code of conduct present.
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
    Good: Security policy present.
  • .vscode
  • .zed
  • apps
    Good: Test files detected (apps/oxfmt/test).
    Issue: Build artifacts or local files may be committed (apps/oxfmt/test/cli/init_with_schema/fixtures/node_modules/oxfmt) (−40 pts).Fix: Remove them and add to .gitignore.
  • crates
  • napi
  • npm
  • tasks
  • .clippy.toml
  • .editorconfig
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
  • .git-blame-ignore-revs
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .ignore
  • .node-version
  • .rustfmt.toml
  • .typos.toml
  • AGENTS.md
  • ARCHITECTURE.md
  • Cargo.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (Cargo.lock). Installs are reproducible.
  • Cargo.toml
    Good: Dependency manifest found (Cargo.toml).
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • cliff.toml
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a PR workflow section (−8 pts).Fix: Explain how to fork, branch, and open a pull request so contributors know what to expect.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • Cross.toml
  • deny.toml
  • justfile
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • MAINTENANCE.md
  • oxc_release.toml
  • oxfmtrc.jsonc
  • oxlintrc.json
  • package.json
  • pnpm-lock.yaml
  • pnpm-workspace.yaml
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • rust-toolchain.toml
  • THIRD-PARTY-LICENSE
  • vite-task.json
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/oxc-project/oxc)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/oxc-project/oxc)

More graded Rust repos