osidemedia/higgsfield-ai-prompt-skill
Grade a repo

77

/ 100

GradeC

Good shape overall. A few tweaks would push it into the top tier.

Top 36% of 5,156 graded repos

Claude AI skill for cinematic Higgsfield AI prompts — 20 sub-skills covering Cinema Studio 2.5/3.0/3.5, MCSLA formula, Soul ID character consistency, Seedance 2.0 prompt modes, Kling 3.0 Motion Control, Elements system, DISCIPLINE framework, production benchmarks, and 17 templates across 3 categories.

Documentation85
Engineering62
Health100
Python185MIT1mo ago

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

16 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.

  3. 3
    CI/CD14pt

    Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.

  4. 4
    CI/CD14pt

    Upload coverage to Codecov, Coveralls, or report it with `--coverage` flags.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

85

Contributing guide5pt73

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

→ Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

README12pt80

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

62

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt70

Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (tests).

CI/CD14pt85

CI is configured (.github/workflows/spec-drift.yml).

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 42
    Forks
  • 63
    Releaseslatest 3mo ago

Community

  • 57% - Fair
    Community health
  • 1 bus factorlow
    author own >50% of commits
  • 185
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • <1h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 0
    Open issues
Repository files30 root entries
  • .claude
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/spec-drift.yml).
  • assets
  • db
  • docs
  • evals
  • scripts
  • skills
  • specs
  • templates
  • tests
    Good: Test files detected (tests).
  • workspace
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .markdownlint.json
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • DISCIPLINE.md
  • image-models.md
  • INDEX.md
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • model-guide.md
  • photodump-presets.md
  • production-benchmarks.md
  • prompt-examples.md
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Issue: No screenshots or images in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • requirements.txt
    Good: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
    Good: Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
  • SKILL.md
  • vocab.md
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/osidemedia/higgsfield-ai-prompt-skill)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/osidemedia/higgsfield-ai-prompt-skill)

More graded Python repos