0
/ 100
Lots of room to improve. Start with a README and CI.
Real time onliner.by price tracking system which saves every price change of tracked items to history
A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code
Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to C (76).
See your top fixesTop fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
- 2CI/CD14pt
Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.
- 3CI/CD14pt
Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.
- 4CI/CD14pt
Upload coverage to Codecov, Coveralls, or report it with `--coverage` flags.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
51
No license detected.
→ Add a LICENSE file. Without one, nobody can legally use, copy, or contribute to your code.
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README is present.
README documents how to install the project.
Engineering
39
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/eslint.yml).
Linter or formatter configured (.eslintrc).
Project health
72
No pushes in over 2 years. Looks unmaintained (−95 pts).
→ A recent commit signals the project is alive and worth using.
Dependency manifest found (package.json).
Repository has a description.
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 2Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- -Community health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 1Watchers
Responsiveness
- 1d 21hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 1Open issues
Repository files14 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/eslint.yml).
- config
- public
- src
- .babelrc
- .env.example
- .eslintrcGood: Linter or formatter configured (.eslintrc).
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .sequelizerc
- nodemon.json
- package-lock.jsonGood: Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
- package.jsonGood: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
- README.mdGood: README is present.Issue: README is fairly short (−10 pts). At 400+ chars you get partial credit; 1,500+ earns the full +20 pts.Fix: Expand with a description, install steps, usage, and examples.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Issue: No screenshots or images in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- webpack.config.js
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/ops1ops/onliner-api-listener)