opengeos/geolibre

0

/ 100

Documentation93
Engineering85
Health92
TypeScript1,155MIT1d ago
Grade a repo

A well-known project done right. Strong docs and solid engineering throughout.

A lightweight, cloud-native GIS platform for visualizing, exploring, and analyzing geospatial data. It runs in the web browser, on the desktop, on mobile, and inside Jupyter notebooks.

Documentation

93

Contributing guide5pt72

CONTRIBUTING guide is very brief (−12 pts for depth). 150+ words earns +6 pts; 400+ earns +12 pts.

→ Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

85

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (backend/geolibre_server/tests).

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (eslint.config.mjs).

Project health

92

Dependency manifest6pt75

Dependency manifest found (package.json).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 154
    Forks
  • 16
    Releaseslatest 14d ago

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 1,155
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 1h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 5
    Open issues
Repository files29 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
  • apps
  • backend
    Good: Test files detected (backend/geolibre_server/tests).
  • docker
  • docs
  • e2e
  • packages
  • packaging
  • python
  • scripts
  • tests
  • workers
  • .dockerignore
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml
  • CITATION.cff
  • CLAUDE.md
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Issue: CONTRIBUTING guide is very brief (−12 pts for depth). 150+ words earns +6 pts; 400+ earns +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • Dockerfile
    Good: Environment pinned via Dockerfile.
  • eslint.config.mjs
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (eslint.config.mjs).
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • mkdocs.yml
  • netlify.toml
  • package-lock.json
    Good: Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
  • package.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
  • playwright.config.ts
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • requirements-docs.txt
  • tsconfig.base.json