octalide/mach

0

/ 100

Documentation84
Engineering58
Health68
PowerShell118MIT1d ago
Grade a repo

Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.

A systems programming language with no hidden behavior.

Documentation

84

Install and run instructions9pt45

README documents how to install the project.

Contributing guide5pt97

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

58

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Reproducibility6pt0

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (.github/tests).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

68

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 1
    Forks
  • 27
    Releaseslatest 11d ago

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 118
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 1d 22h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 16
    Open issues
Repository files14 root entries
  • .github
    Good: Test files detected (.github/tests).
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • doc
  • src
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • install.ps1
  • install.sh
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • mach.lock
  • mach.toml
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • SECURITY.md
    Good: Security policy present.