nomic-ai/gpt4all
Grade a repo

78

/ 100

GradeB

Well engineered. The main gaps are CI and recent activity.

Top 30% of 5,156 graded repos

GPT4All: Run Local LLMs on Any Device. Open-source and available for commercial use.

Documentation88
Engineering77
Health79
C++77,387MIT1y ago

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

15 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.

  3. 3
    CI/CD14pt

    Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.

  4. 4
    CI/CD14pt

    Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

88

Contributing guide5pt67

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

README12pt90

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

77

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/close_issues.yml).

Reproducibility6pt70

Lockfile present (gpt4all-bindings/typescript/yarn.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (gpt4all-bindings/python/gpt4all/tests).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (gpt4all-chat/.flake8).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

79

Activity5pt20

No pushes in over a year (−80 pts).

→ A recent commit signals the project is alive and worth contributing to.

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (gpt4all-bindings/python/setup.py).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • 0 / 0
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 8,291
    Forks
  • 38
    Releaseslatest 2y ago

Community

  • 62% - Fair
    Community health
  • 2 bus factor
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 77,387
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 3h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 771
    Open issues
Repository files16 root entries
  • .circleci
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/close_issues.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • common
  • gpt4all-backend
  • gpt4all-bindings
    Good: Test files detected (gpt4all-bindings/python/gpt4all/tests).
    Good: Lockfile present (gpt4all-bindings/typescript/yarn.lock). Installs are reproducible.
    Good: Dependency manifest found (gpt4all-bindings/python/setup.py).
  • gpt4all-chat
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (gpt4all-chat/.flake8).
  • gpt4all-training
  • .codespellrc
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .gitmodules
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • gpt4all-lora-demo.gif
  • LICENSE.txt
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • MAINTAINERS.md
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • roadmap.md
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/nomic-ai/gpt4all)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/nomic-ai/gpt4all)

More graded C++ repos