modelengine-group/unified-cache-management

0

/ 100

Documentation64
Engineering80
Health100
Python293MIT1d ago
Grade a repo

Good shape overall. A few tweaks would push it into the top tier.

Persist and reuse KV Cache to speedup your LLM.

Documentation

64

Contributing guide5pt5

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

Install and run instructions9pt45

No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).

→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

README12pt85

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

80

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (benchmarks/logging_perf_test.py).

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/lint-and-test.yml).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 86
    Forks
  • 11
    Releaseslatest 2mo ago

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 293
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 16h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 69
    Open issues
Repository files25 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/lint-and-test.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • benchmarks
    Good: Test files detected (benchmarks/logging_perf_test.py).
  • docker
  • docs
  • examples
  • scripts
  • test
    Good: Environment pinned via test/runner-docker/Dockerfile.
  • ucm
  • .clang-format
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml
  • .readthedocs.yaml
  • CMakeLists.txt
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • format.sh
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • MANIFEST.in
  • pyproject.toml
    Good: Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
  • README_zh.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • README.md
  • requirements-lint.txt
  • requirements.txt
    Good: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
  • setup.py
  • ucm_patch.pth
  • version.ini