Rough and inactive. Tests, CI, and a fuller README would revive it.
A chrome web extension for improving code reviews on Github or Azure DevOps
Documentation
82
Contributing guidance is in the README, not a dedicated CONTRIBUTING.md (−20 pts).
→ Moving it to a CONTRIBUTING.md makes it easier to find and keeps the README focused. A dedicated file earns +47 pts base.
README is present.
README documents how to install the project.
Licensed under LGPL-2.1.
Engineering
63
No linter or formatter found.
→ Add ESLint (eslint.config.js) and/or Prettier (.prettierrc), install them as devDependencies, and add a `lint` script to package.json.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/main.yml).
Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
Test files detected (test).
Project health
62
No pushes in over 2 years. Looks unmaintained (−95 pts).
→ A recent commit signals the project is alive and worth using.
Repository has a description.
Dependency manifest found (package.json).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 0Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 0Watchers
Responsiveness
- —Median issue response
- —Median PR merge time
- 0Open issues
Repository files18 root entries
- .devcontainer
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/main.yml).Good: Dependabot configured for npm.
- .vscode
- assets
- docs
- src
- src-packed
- store
- testGood: Test files detected (test).
- _import.js
- .gitattributes
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- inclusive.code-workspace
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under LGPL-2.1.
- package-lock.jsonGood: Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
- package.jsonGood: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
- PRIVACY.md
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.