80
/ 100
Well engineered. The main gaps are setup instructions and CI.
Control how your documents get signed
Top fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.
- 2CI/CD14pt
Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.
- 3CI/CD14pt
Upload coverage to Codecov, Coveralls, or report it with `--coverage` flags.
- 4README12pt
Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
60
No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).
→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.
→ Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
README is present.
Licensed under AGPL-3.0.
Engineering
85
CI is configured (.github/workflows/lint-eslint.yml).
Test files detected (playwright/e2e/confetti-after-signing-policy.spec.ts).
PHP linting configured (.editorconfig).
Lockfile present (composer.lock). Installs are reproducible.
Issue or PR templates present.
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (composer.json).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- 255 / 1595Commits (30d / 90d)
- 121Forks
- 218Releaseslatest 5y ago
Community
- 100% - GoodCommunity health
- 1 bus factorlowauthor own >50% of commits
- 784Watchers
Responsiveness
- 125d 19hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 83Open issues
Repository files56 root entries
- .devcontainerGood: Environment pinned via .devcontainer/docker-compose.yml.
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/lint-eslint.yml).Good: Dependabot covers 3 ecosystems (composer, npm, github-actions). Dependencies stay current.Good: Issue or PR templates present.
- .patches
- .tx
- .well-known
- appinfo
- composer
- img
- l10n
- lib
- LICENSES
- playwrightGood: Test files detected (playwright/e2e/confetti-after-signing-policy.spec.ts).
- src
- templates
- tests
- vendor-bin
- .editorconfigGood: PHP linting configured (.editorconfig).
- .eslintignore
- .gitattributes
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .gitmodules
- .l10nignore
- .npmignore
- .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
- .prettierrc
- 3rdparty
- AGENTS.md
- AUTHORS
- babel.config.js
- CHANGELOG.md
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdGood: Code of conduct present.
- composer.jsonGood: Dependency manifest found (composer.json).
- composer.lockGood: Lockfile present (composer.lock). Installs are reproducible.
- CONTRIBUTING.mdIssue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).Issue: Contributing guide lacks a PR workflow section (−8 pts).Fix: Explain how to fork, branch, and open a pull request so contributors know what to expect.Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
- COPYING
- eslint.config.mjs
- funding.json
- Makefile
- openapi-administration.json
- openapi-full.json
- openapi.json
- package-lock.json
- package.json
- patches.json
- patches.lock.json
- playwright.config.ts
- psalm.xml
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
- rector.php
- redocly.yaml
- REUSE.toml
- SECURITY.mdGood: Security policy present.
- stylelint.config.js
- tsconfig.json
- vite.config.mjs
- vitest.config.js
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/libresign/libresign)