0
/ 100
Getting noticed, but rough fundamentals could turn visitors away.
Variety of tools(web) and links, each housed in its own folder within the repository.
A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code
Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to B (81).
See your top fixesTop fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
- 2CI/CD14pt
If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.
- 3Install and run instructions9pt
Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
- 4Install and run instructions9pt
Add a .env.example listing all required environment variables so contributors know what to set up.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
80
README documents how to install the project.
CONTRIBUTING guide is very brief (−12 pts for depth). 150+ words earns +6 pts; 400+ earns +12 pts.
→ Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
README is present.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
12
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No CI configuration detected in this repository.
→ If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.
Issue or PR templates present.
Project health
68
No dependency manifest detected at root.
→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 5Forks
- 1Releaseslatest 6mo ago
Community
- -Community health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 152Watchers
Responsiveness
- -Median issue response
- -Median PR merge time
- 0Open issues
Repository files35 root entries
- .githubGood: Issue or PR templates present.
- css
- font
- games
- img
- js
- tools
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- android-chrome-192x192.png
- android-chrome-512x512.png
- apple-touch-icon.png
- browserconfig.xml
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdGood: Code of conduct present.
- CONTRIBUTING.mdIssue: CONTRIBUTING guide is very brief (−12 pts for depth). 150+ words earns +6 pts; 400+ earns +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
- favicon-16x16.png
- favicon-32x32.png
- favicon.ico
- index.html
- index(src).html
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- mstile-144x144.png
- mstile-150x150.png
- mstile-310x150.png
- mstile-310x310.png
- mstile-70x70.png
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
- robots.txt
- safari-pinned-tab.svg
- screenshots.png
- screenshots1.png
- screenshots2.jpg
- SECURITY.mdGood: Security policy present.
- site.webmanifest
- sitemap.xml
- sw.js
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/kostassliazas/project-kitten)