0
/ 100
Popular and well-maintained. A little polish away from elite status.
Effing package management! Build packages for multiple platforms (deb, rpm, etc) with great ease and sanity.
Top fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.
- 2CI/CD14pt
Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.
- 3CI/CD14pt
Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.
- 4CI/CD14pt
Upload coverage to Codecov, Coveralls, or report it with `--coverage` flags.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
72
README is present.
Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
README documents how to install the project.
Licensed under Other.
Engineering
74
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
Test files detected (spec).
Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/ruby.yml).
Ruby linting configured (.rubocop.yml).
Project health
95
Actively maintained (pushed within 3 months).
Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).
Repository has a description.
.gitignore present.
Repository files24 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ruby.yml).
- bin
- docsGood: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
- lib
- specGood: Test files detected (spec).
- templates
- test
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .readthedocs.yaml
- .rubocop.ymlGood: Ruby linting configured (.rubocop.yml).
- Brewfile
- CHANGELOG.rst
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdGood: Code of conduct present.
- CONTRIBUTORS
- DockerfileGood: Environment pinned via Dockerfile.
- fpm.gemspec
- GemfileGood: Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under Other.
- Makefile
- notify-failure.sh
- README.rstGood: README is present.Issue: README has little structure (−15 pts). Add 2-3 headings for +8 pts; 4+ earns +15 pts.Fix: Break it into sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using Markdown headings.Issue: No screenshots or images in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- requirements.txtGood: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
- singularity.def
- Vagrantfile
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/jordansissel/fpm)