0
/ 100
Getting noticed, but rough fundamentals could turn visitors away.
The open knowledge layer for AI agents and APIs
A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code
Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to B (80).
See your top fixesTop fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
- 2CI/CD14pt
Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.
- 3CI/CD14pt
Add `pull_request:` to the workflow `on:` triggers.
- 4CI/CD14pt
Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
82
No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).
→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
This repository is large enough that GitHub truncated the file tree. The scan is based on a partial file list, so some checks may under-report.
Licensed under CC0-1.0.
Engineering
24
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/rebuild-indexes.yaml).
Issue or PR templates present.
Project health
58
No dependency manifest detected at root.
→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 29Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- -Community health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 237Watchers
Responsiveness
- 55d 9hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 13Open issues
Repository files13 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/rebuild-indexes.yaml).Good: Issue or PR templates present.
- apis
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- AGENTS.md
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdGood: Code of conduct present.
- CONTRIBUTING.mdGood: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
- FEEDBACK-FILES.md
- LICENSE.mdGood: Licensed under CC0-1.0.
- OAK.md
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- SECURITY.mdGood: Security policy present.
- STRUCTURE.md
- SUPPORT.md
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/jentic/jentic-public-apis)