0

/ 100

GradeF

Getting noticed, but rough fundamentals could turn visitors away.

Higher than 32% of 5,156 graded repos

一款文字修仙小游戏

A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code

Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to B (80).

See your top fixes
Now
F
46
Potential
B
80

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

16 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.

  3. 3
    README12pt

    Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.

  4. 4
    License6pt

    Add a LICENSE file. Without one, nobody can legally use, copy, or contribute to your code.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

69

License6pt0

No license detected.

Add a LICENSE file. Without one, nobody can legally use, copy, or contribute to your code.

Contributing guide5pt72

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

README12pt80

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt100

README documents how to install the project.

Engineering

20

Tests18pt0

No tests detected anywhere in the repository.

Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.

CI/CD14pt0

No CI configuration detected in this repository.

If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.eslintrc.json).

Project health

73

Repository metadata5pt40

No repository description set on GitHub (−60 pts).

Add a one-line description in the repo Settings → About. It appears in search results and social previews.

Dependency manifest6pt65

Dependency manifest found (package.json).

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 35
    Forks
  • 2
    Releaseslatest 7mo ago

Community

  • -
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 140
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 1d 8h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 1
    Open issues
Repository files50 root entries
  • .claude
  • components
  • constants
  • doc
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • functions
  • hooks
  • party
  • public
  • scripts
  • server
  • services
  • ssl
  • store
  • utils
  • views
  • .dockerignore
  • .env.development
  • .env.example
  • .env.production
  • .eslintignore
  • .eslintrc.json
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.eslintrc.json).
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .npmrc
  • .prettierignore
  • .prettierrc
  • .vercelignore
  • App.tsx
  • docker-compose.full.yml
  • docker-compose.yml
  • Dockerfile
    Good: Environment pinned via Dockerfile.
  • Dockerfile.backend
  • index.css
  • index.html
  • index.tsx
  • Makefile
  • metadata.json
  • nginx.conf
  • package-lock.json
    Good: Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
  • package.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
  • partykit.json
  • pnpm-lock.yaml
  • postcss.config.js
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Issue: No screenshots or images in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • tailwind.config.js
  • tsconfig.json
  • types.ts
  • vercel.json
  • vite-env.d.ts
  • vite.config.ts
  • wrangler.toml
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/jeasonloop/react-xiuxian-game)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/jeasonloop/react-xiuxian-game)

More graded TypeScript repos