0
/ 100
Real traction, but rough engineering makes it hard for contributors to trust.
Windows 11-like custom directory icon.
Documentation
54
No license detected.
→ Add a LICENSE file. Without one, nobody can legally use, copy, or contribute to your code.
Contributing guidance is in the README, not a dedicated CONTRIBUTING.md (−20 pts).
→ Moving it to a CONTRIBUTING.md makes it easier to find and keeps the README focused. A dedicated file earns +47 pts base.
No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).
→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
README is present.
Engineering
24
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/convert.yml).
Issue or PR templates present.
Project health
48
No dependency manifest detected at root.
→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.
No .gitignore found (−60 pts).
→ Add a .gitignore to keep build output, node_modules, and secrets out of version control.
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 135Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- -Community health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 1,833Watchers
Responsiveness
- 7d 10hMedian issue response
- 1d 13hMedian PR merge time
- 21Open issues
Repository files7 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/convert.yml).Good: Issue or PR templates present.
- small
- svg
- template
- README.id.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- README.md
- README.zh_cn.md