Good shape overall. A few tweaks would push it into the top tier.

Builds API CLI plugin

Documentation

56

README12pt35

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt45

README documents how to install the project.

Contributing guide5pt75

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

License6pt100

Licensed under ISC.

Engineering

95

CI/CD14pt83

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (.mocharc.json).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).

Reproducibility6pt100

Lockfile present (yarn.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (package.json).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 29
    Forks
  • 13
    Releaseslatest 1y ago

Community

  • Community health
  • authors own >50% of commits
  • 137
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 11h
    Median issue response
  • 17h
    Median PR merge time
  • 20
    Open issues
Repository files21 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (github-actions, npm). Dependencies stay current.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • bin
  • scripts
  • src
  • test
  • .editorconfig
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .mocharc.json
    Good: Test files detected (.mocharc.json).
  • .nycrc.json
  • .tool-versions
    Good: Environment pinned via .tool-versions.
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CODEOWNERS
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • eslint.config.mjs
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under ISC.
  • package.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Issue: No screenshots or images in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Issue: No live demo link in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Link to a deployed version, docs site, or demo video. Users want to see it running.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • release-channels.yml
  • SECURITY.md
    Good: Security policy present.
  • tsconfig.json
  • yarn.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (yarn.lock). Installs are reproducible.