60

/ 100

GradeD

Early stage. Tests, CI, and a strong README would raise this score quickly.

Higher than 44% of 5,156 graded repos

Livewire 國家/州/城市連動下拉選單

A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code

Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to B (81).

See your top fixes
Now
D
60
Potential
B
81

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

12 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.

  3. 3
    README12pt

    Expand with a description, install steps, usage, and examples.

  4. 4
    README12pt

    Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

56

License6pt0

No license detected.

Add a LICENSE file. Without one, nobody can legally use, copy, or contribute to your code.

Contributing guide5pt0

No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).

Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.

README12pt73

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt100

README documents how to install the project.

Engineering

48

CI/CD14pt0

No CI configuration detected in this repository.

If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt70

Lockfile present (composer.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (phpunit.xml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

PHP linting configured (.editorconfig).

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (composer.json).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 3
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • 28% - Weak
    Community health
  • 1 bus factorlow
    author own >50% of commits
  • 6
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • -
    Median issue response
  • -
    Median PR merge time
  • 0
    Open issues
Repository files22 root entries
  • app
  • bootstrap
  • config
  • database
  • lang
  • public
  • resources
  • routes
  • storage
  • tests
  • .editorconfig
    Good: PHP linting configured (.editorconfig).
  • .env.example
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • artisan
  • composer.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (composer.json).
  • composer.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (composer.lock). Installs are reproducible.
  • package-lock.json
  • package.json
  • phpunit.xml
    Good: Test files detected (phpunit.xml).
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Issue: README is fairly short (−10 pts). At 400+ chars you get partial credit; 1,500+ earns the full +20 pts.Fix: Expand with a description, install steps, usage, and examples.
    Issue: README has some structure (−7 pts). 2-3 headings earns partial credit; 4+ earns the full +15 pts.Fix: Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • vite.config.js
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/henryleeworld/laravel-livewire-country-state-city-cascading-dropdown)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/henryleeworld/laravel-livewire-country-state-city-cascading-dropdown)

More graded PHP repos