google-deepmind/envlogger
Grade a repo

72

/ 100

GradeC

Good shape overall. A few tweaks would push it into the top tier.

Top 43% of 5,156 graded repos

A tool for recording RL trajectories.

Documentation86
Engineering55
Health91
Python120Apache-2.01mo ago

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

18 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.

  3. 3
    CI/CD14pt

    Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.

  4. 4
    CI/CD14pt

    Upload coverage to Codecov, Coveralls, or report it with `--coverage` flags.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

86

Contributing guide5pt53

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

→ Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

README12pt90

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under Apache-2.0.

Engineering

55

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (envlogger/backends/cross_language_test/cross_language_test.py).

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (envlogger/requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.

Project health

91

Housekeeping3pt40

No .gitignore found (−60 pts).

→ Add a .gitignore to keep build output, node_modules, and secrets out of version control.

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (setup.py).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • 13 / 15
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 16
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • 50% - Fair
    Community health
  • 1 bus factorlow
    author own >50% of commits
  • 120
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 3h
    Median issue response
  • 2d 19h
    Median PR merge time
  • 2
    Open issues
Repository files12 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
  • docker
    Good: Environment pinned via docker/Dockerfile.
  • docs
  • envlogger
    Good: Test files detected (envlogger/backends/cross_language_test/cross_language_test.py).
    Good: Lockfile present (envlogger/requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
  • patches
  • .bazelrc
  • .bazelversion
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a PR workflow section (−8 pts).Fix: Explain how to fork, branch, and open a pull request so contributors know what to expect.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under Apache-2.0.
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • setup.py
    Good: Dependency manifest found (setup.py).
  • WORKSPACE.bazel
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/google-deepmind/envlogger)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/google-deepmind/envlogger)

More graded Python repos