0
/ 100
Early-stage engineering. The fastest wins are test coverage and CI.
Chrome extension to view UT Dallas professor ratings easily
A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code
Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to A (93).
See your top fixesTop fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
- 2CI/CD14pt
If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.
- 3Reproducibility6pt
Add a Dockerfile, .nvmrc, or .python-version to pin the runtime version and make the environment reproducible.
- 4Reproducibility6pt
Add .github/dependabot.yml with at least one package-ecosystem entry, or a renovate.json, so dependencies are updated automatically.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
84
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README is present.
README documents how to install the project.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
19
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No CI configuration detected in this repository.
→ If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
Linter or formatter configured (extension/.prettierrc.mjs).
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 0Forks
- 17Releaseslatest 2y ago
Community
- 42% - WeakCommunity health
- 1 bus factorlowauthor own >50% of commits
- 5Watchers
Responsiveness
- 2d 21hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 0Open issues
Repository files11 root entries
- api
- docs
- extensionGood: Linter or formatter configured (extension/.prettierrc.mjs).
- raw_data
- scripts
- supabase
- .env.example
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- requirements.txtGood: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.Good: Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/giridharrnair/profstatsutd)