83
/ 100
Good shape overall. A few tweaks would push it into the top tier.
A benchmark for evaluating LLMs on open-ended CS problems. Exploring the Next Frontier of Computer Science.
Top fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.
- 2CI/CD14pt
Add a step like `run: npm test`, `run: pytest`, or `run: tox` to your workflow file.
- 3CI/CD14pt
Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.
- 4CI/CD14pt
Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
96
README documents how to install the project.
Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
README is present.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
68
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/check-overlap.yml).
Test files detected (adapters/frontier-cs-2.0/src/frontier_cs_2_0/task-template/tests).
Lockfile present (algorithmic/package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
Issue or PR templates present.
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 38Forks
- 1Releaseslatest 6mo ago
Community
- 62% - FairCommunity health
- 2 bus factorauthors own >50% of commits
- 247Watchers
Responsiveness
- 3hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 6Open issues
Repository files20 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/check-overlap.yml).Good: Issue or PR templates present.
- 2.0Good: Licensed under MIT.Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.Good: Environment pinned via 2.0/problems/duckdb_e2e_query_optimization/docker/agent/Dockerfile.
- adaptersGood: Test files detected (adapters/frontier-cs-2.0/src/frontier_cs_2_0/task-template/tests).
- algorithmicGood: Lockfile present (algorithmic/package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
- assets
- docs
- leaderboard
- research
- scripts
- src
- tools
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .pre-commit-config.yaml
- ARCHITECTURE.md
- CONTRIBUTING.md
- LICENSE
- Makefile
- pyproject.tomlGood: Dependency manifest found (pyproject.toml).
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- SUBMIT.md
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/frontiercs/frontier-cs)