60
/ 100
Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.
A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code
Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to A (93).
See your top fixesTop fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Tests18pt
Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
- 2CI/CD14pt
If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.
- 3Install and run instructions9pt
Add a .env.example listing all required environment variables so contributors know what to set up.
- 4Reproducibility6pt
Add .github/dependabot.yml with at least one package-ecosystem entry so dependencies are updated automatically.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
94
CONTRIBUTING guide found.
README documents how to install the project.
README is present.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
32
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No CI configuration detected in this repository.
→ If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.
Lockfile present (pnpm-lock.yaml). Installs are reproducible.
Linter or formatter configured (.prettierrc).
Issue or PR templates present.
Project health
76
No repository description set on GitHub (−60 pts).
→ Add a one-line description in the repo Settings → About. It appears in search results and social previews.
Dependency manifest found (package.json).
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 228Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- 50% - FairCommunity health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 462Watchers
Responsiveness
- -Median issue response
- 2hMedian PR merge time
- 8Open issues
Repository files21 root entries
- .devcontainer
- .githubGood: Issue or PR templates present.
- .husky
- .vscode
- srcGood: CONTRIBUTING guide found.Issue: CONTRIBUTING guide contents could not be read (−28 pts vs a readable file).Fix: Move the file to the repo root or docs/CONTRIBUTING.md so its setup, style, test, and PR sections can be graded.
- static
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .node-versionGood: Environment pinned via .node-version.
- .npmrc
- .prettierignore
- .prettierrcGood: Linter or formatter configured (.prettierrc).
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdGood: Code of conduct present.
- crowdin.yml
- eslint.config.js
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- package.jsonGood: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
- pnpm-lock.yamlGood: Lockfile present (pnpm-lock.yaml). Installs are reproducible.
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- svelte.config.js
- tsconfig.json
- vite.config.ts
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/files-community/website)