Popular for its size, but the engineering basics lag behind the interest.
Uber-project for (some) standard Jackson textual format backends: csv, properties, yaml (xml to be added in future)
Documentation
65
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).
→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
README is present.
Licensed under Apache-2.0.
Engineering
47
No Java/Kotlin linter configured.
→ Add Checkstyle or Spotless for Java formatting, or ktlint/Detekt for Kotlin. Run it via Maven/Gradle or as a CI step.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/main.yml).
Test files detected (csv/src/test).
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (pom.xml).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 158Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 451Watchers
Responsiveness
- <1hMedian issue response
- 2d 24hMedian PR merge time
- 43Open issues
Repository files17 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/main.yml).Good: Dependabot configured for github-actions.
- .mvn
- csvGood: Test files detected (csv/src/test).
- docs
- properties
- release-notes
- toml
- yaml
- .gitattributes
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .travis.yml
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under Apache-2.0.
- mvnw
- mvnw.cmd
- pom.xmlGood: Dependency manifest found (pom.xml).
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- SECURITY.mdGood: Security policy present.