enzymead/enzyme
Grade a repo

0

/ 100

GradeD

Strong community interest, but tests, CI, or docs need work.

High-performance automatic differentiation of LLVM and MLIR.

Documentation83
Engineering47
Health68
LLVM1,633Othertoday

Documentation

83

Contributing guide5pt72

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

README12pt75

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under Other.

Engineering

47

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt12

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/enzyme-ci.yml).

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (enzyme/test).

Project health

68

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 169
    Forks
  • 272
    Releaseslatest 4y ago

Community

  • -
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 1,633
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • <1h
    Median issue response
  • 3h
    Median PR merge time
  • 278
    Open issues
Repository files11 root entries
  • .devcontainer
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/enzyme-ci.yml).
    Good: Dependabot configured for github-actions.
  • .packaging
  • enzyme
    Good: Test files detected (enzyme/test).
  • integration
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • CITATION.bib
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under Other.
  • Readme.md
    Good: README is present.
    Issue: README has little structure (−15 pts). Add 2-3 headings for +8 pts; 4+ earns +15 pts.Fix: Break it into sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using Markdown headings.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.