elysiajs/elysia
Grade a repo

85

/ 100

GradeB

A top-tier open source project. Docs, tests, and CI are all in excellent shape.

Top 22% of 5,156 graded repos

Ergonomic Framework for Humans

Documentation62
Engineering94
Health100
TypeScript18,547MIT1mo ago

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

13 to address
  1. 1
    CI/CD14pt

    Add a lint step to catch style issues automatically.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    Add `tsc --noEmit`, `mypy`, or `cargo check` to catch type errors before they merge.

  3. 3
    CI/CD14pt

    Upload coverage to Codecov, Coveralls, or report it with `--coverage` flags.

  4. 4
    README12pt

    Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

62

Install and run instructions9pt0

No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).

→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.

Contributing guide5pt78

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

→ Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

README12pt83

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

94

CI/CD14pt85

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Reproducibility6pt90

Lockfile present (bun.lock). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (test).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.eslintrc.json).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (package.json).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 543
    Forks
  • 106
    Releaseslatest 2y ago

Community

  • 62% - Fair
    Community health
  • 1 bus factorlow
    author own >50% of commits
  • 18,547
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 4d 21h
    Median issue response
  • 1d 15h
    Median PR merge time
  • 344
    Open issues
Repository files21 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (npm, github-actions). Dependencies stay current.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • example
  • src
  • test
    Good: Test files detected (test).
  • .eslintrc.json
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.eslintrc.json).
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .npmignore
  • .npmrc
  • .prettierrc
  • build.ts
  • bun.lock
    Good: Lockfile present (bun.lock). Installs are reproducible.
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • knip.json
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • package.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Issue: README has some structure (−7 pts). 2-3 headings earns partial credit; 4+ earns the full +15 pts.Fix: Add more sections (Overview, Install, Usage, Contributing) using ## headings.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • tsconfig.dts.json
  • tsconfig.json
  • tsconfig.test.json
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/elysiajs/elysia)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/elysiajs/elysia)

More graded TypeScript repos