ecamp/ecamp3
Grade a repo

74

/ 100

GradeC

Solid engineering. The biggest lever is test coverage.

Top 41% of 5,156 graded repos

eCamp v3 is a web-based app for camp and course planning. The application is specialized for camps and courses of youth associations and for Y+S offers in the sport of camp sports/trekking.

Documentation91
Engineering61
Health79
PHP154AGPL-3.028d ago

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

14 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Set scripts.test in package.json to your actual test command, e.g. "vitest" or "jest".

  2. 2
    README12pt

    Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.

  3. 3
    Reproducibility6pt

    Add .github/dependabot.yml with at least one package-ecosystem entry so dependencies are updated automatically.

  4. 4
    Issue and PR templates6pt

    Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

91

Contributing guide5pt80

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

README12pt85

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt100

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under AGPL-3.0.

Engineering

61

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Tests18pt35

Test files detected (.helm/ecamp3/templates/tests).

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/check-dependencies.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (.ops/aws-setup/eslint.config.mjs).

Project health

79

Dependency manifest6pt55

Dependency manifest found (package.json).

Housekeeping3pt60

.gitignore present.

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • 388 / 1554
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 67
    Forks
  • 19
    Releaseslatest 1y ago

Community

  • 50% - Fair
    Community health
  • 2 bus factor
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 154
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 43d
    Median issue response
  • 7h
    Median PR merge time
  • 240
    Open issues
Repository files44 root entries
  • .agents
    Good: Environment pinned via .agents/.ecamp/playwright-cli/Dockerfile.
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .cache
  • .docker-hub
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/check-dependencies.yml).
  • .helm
    Good: Test files detected (.helm/ecamp3/templates/tests).
  • .ops
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (.ops/aws-setup/eslint.config.mjs).
  • .playwright
  • .vscode
  • api
    Issue: Build artifacts or local files may be committed (api/.env) (−40 pts).Fix: Remove them and add to .gitignore.
  • common
  • dev-setup
  • e2e
  • frontend
  • frontend-old
  • pdf
  • print
  • translation
  • .claude
  • .dockerignore
  • .env.ci
  • .gitattributes
  • .gitignore
  • .nvmrc
  • .opencode
  • .prettierignore
  • .prettierrc
  • AGENTS.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • CONTRIBUTING_DE.md
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Good: Contributing guide describes code style expectations.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • create-ecamp3-test-database.sh
  • crowdin.yml
  • docker-compose.override.yml
  • docker-compose.yml
  • docker-setup.sh
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under AGPL-3.0.
  • package-lock.json
    Good: Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
  • package.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
  • pgadmin-servers.json
  • pre-commit.sh
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • renovate.json
  • reverse-proxy-nginx.conf
  • wait-for-container-startup.sh
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/ecamp/ecamp3)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/ecamp/ecamp3)

More graded PHP repos