64

/ 100

GradeD

A workable base with real gaps. Start with CI and issue and PR templates.

Higher than 48% of 5,156 graded repos

Watson is the fastest, easiest way to build scalable RESTful web servers and services in C#.

A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code

Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to B (83).

See your top fixes
Now
D
64
Potential
B
83

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

10 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.

  2. 2
    CI/CD14pt

    If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.

  3. 3
    Install and run instructions9pt

    Add a .env.example listing all required environment variables so contributors know what to set up.

  4. 4
    Reproducibility6pt

    Enable and commit packages.lock.json so NuGet restores are repeatable.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

95

Contributing guide5pt85

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

31

CI/CD14pt0

No CI configuration detected in this repository.

If your CI lives elsewhere (a private repo that builds this one) or this project is itself a CI/CD tool, mark this check Not Applicable. Otherwise add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs tests on each push. It takes 15 minutes and reassures contributors their changes won't break things.

Linting and formatting5pt0

No .NET formatter configured.

Add an .editorconfig to define C# formatting rules and run `dotnet format` in CI.

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Reproducibility6pt10

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

Enable and commit packages.lock.json so NuGet restores are repeatable.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (src/Test.Nunit/WatsonTouchstoneNunitTests.cs).

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (src/Test.Authentication/Test.Authentication.csproj).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • 4 / 7
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 104
    Forks
  • 0
    Releases

Community

  • 62% - Fair
    Community health
  • 1 bus factorlow
    author own >50% of commits
  • 503
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • <1h
    Median issue response
  • 9h
    Median PR merge time
  • 0
    Open issues
Repository files21 root entries
  • .github
  • archive
  • assets
  • nupkgs
  • src
    Good: Test files detected (src/Test.Nunit/WatsonTouchstoneNunitTests.cs).
    Good: Environment pinned via src/Test.Docker/Dockerfile.
    Good: Dependency manifest found (src/Test.Authentication/Test.Authentication.csproj).
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CLAUDE.md
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • DONATIONS.md
  • LICENSE.md
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • MIGRATING_FROM_WATSONWEBSOCKET.md
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • TELEMETRY.md
  • test.bat
  • TESTING_HTTP2_HTTP3.md
  • TESTING.md
  • WEBSERVER_SETTINGS.md
  • WEBSOCKET_CLIENT.md
  • WEBSOCKETS_API.md
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/dotnet/watsonwebserver)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/dotnet/watsonwebserver)

More graded C# repos