cuihuan/awesome-ai-gateway

0

/ 100

Documentation92
Engineering58
Health68
Python23CC0-1.01d ago
Grade a repo

Strong early engineering with some momentum.

⚡ Awesome AI Gateway — curated comparison of 50+ AI gateways & LLM proxies (LiteLLM, OpenRouter, Portkey, Kong, Higress, new-api, Bifrost) by cost, security, compliance & self-hosting. Decision tree + reproducible benchmarks. Open source, bilingual, updated daily.

Documentation

92

Contributing guide5pt64

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under CC0-1.0.

Engineering

58

Linting and formatting5pt0

No linter or formatter config found.

→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.

Reproducibility6pt0

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

→ Commit poetry.lock, uv.lock, pdm.lock, Pipfile.lock, conda-lock.yml, or another lockfile for your Python dependency manager.

CI/CD14pt57

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (scripts/test_canary_check.py).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

68

Dependency manifest6pt0

No dependency manifest detected at root.

→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • —
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 10
    Forks
  • 1
    Releaseslatest 6d ago

Community

  • —
    Community health
  • —
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 23
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 18h
    Median issue response
  • 8h
    Median PR merge time
  • 1
    Open issues
Repository files17 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • assets
  • compare
  • data
  • docs
  • scripts
    Good: Test files detected (scripts/test_canary_check.py).
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • BENCHMARKS.md
  • BENCHMARKS.zh-CN.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a PR workflow section (−8 pts).Fix: Explain how to fork, branch, and open a pull request so contributors know what to expect.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • index.html
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under CC0-1.0.
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • README.zh-CN.md
  • robots.txt
  • sitemap.xml