0
/ 100
Real traction, but rough engineering makes it hard for contributors to trust.
Immediate mode 3D gizmo for scene editing and other controls based on Dear Imgui
Documentation
82
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README documents how to install the project.
README is present.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
16
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).
→ Commit the lockfile for this project's package manager so installs produce the same dependency versions everywhere.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/build.yml).
Project health
68
No dependency manifest detected at root.
→ Add a manifest (package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, go.mod, etc.) so others can install dependencies in one command.
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 1,072Forks
- 3Releaseslatest 1mo ago
Community
- -Community health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 3,946Watchers
Responsiveness
- 19hMedian issue response
- 17hMedian PR merge time
- 126Open issues
Repository files11 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/build.yml).
- docs
- example
- images
- src
- vcpkg-example
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- CMakeLists.txt
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- Makefile
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.