Well engineered for its size. A portfolio piece worth showing off.

Build LangGraph agents like Next.js apps.

Outstanding. A score of 96/100 puts this repo in a very small tier of truly well-engineered projects.

Documentation

95

Contributing guide5pt71

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

README12pt100

README is present.

Install and run instructions9pt100

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

Licensed under MIT.

Engineering

99

Reproducibility6pt90

Lockfile present (pnpm-lock.yaml). Installs are reproducible.

Tests18pt100

Test files detected (apps/web/app/components/blog/post-index.test.ts).

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (packages/config-biome/biome.json).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

89

Dependency manifest6pt65

Dependency manifest found (package.json).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 2
    Forks
  • 159
    Releaseslatest 1mo ago

Community

  • Community health
  • authors own >50% of commits
  • 87
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 1h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 10
    Open issues
Repository files24 root entries
  • .changeset
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (npm, github-actions). Dependencies stay current.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • apps
    Good: Test files detected (apps/web/app/components/blog/post-index.test.ts).
  • docs
  • examples
  • packages
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (packages/config-biome/biome.json).
  • scripts
  • test
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .npmrc
  • audit-known-issues.md
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
  • CONTRIBUTORS.md
  • LICENSE
    Good: Licensed under MIT.
  • package.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
  • pnpm-lock.yaml
    Good: Lockfile present (pnpm-lock.yaml). Installs are reproducible.
  • pnpm-workspace.yaml
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • SECURITY.md
    Good: Security policy present.
  • SUPPORT.md
  • tsconfig.json
  • turbo.json
  • vitest.workspace.ts