79
/ 100
Solid engineering. The biggest lever is fabrication outputs. Impressive for a brand-new repo.
Inverter/Charger Project managed by Flamingo and Cactus
Top fixes
Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight
- 1Design documentation15pt
Split design notes, assembly, and testing into separate docs as the project grows.
- 2README12pt
Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.
- 3Build and fabrication9pt
Add a section on how to get the board made: export gerbers, order from a fab (JLCPCB, PCBWay, OSH Park), and use the BOM.
- 4BOM and manufacturability8pt
Commit a gerber set (or a fab zip) so the board can be ordered without regenerating outputs. Some projects intentionally leave this to the fab step.
Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.
The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.
Scorecard
Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first
Documentation
74
No fabrication or ordering instructions in the README (−50 pts).
→ Add a section on how to get the board made: export gerbers, order from a fab (JLCPCB, PCBWay, OSH Park), and use the BOM.
Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.
→ Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
README is present.
Licensed under CERN-OHL-W-2.0.
Engineering
76
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
A bill of materials is committed.
Dedicated design documentation is present.
Editable schematic source is committed (not just an image).
Project health
100
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- -Commits (30d / 90d)
- 0Forks
- 0Releases
Community
- 57% - FairCommunity health
- -authors own >50% of commits
- 4Watchers
Responsiveness
- -Median issue response
- -Median PR merge time
- 0Open issues
Repository files7 root entries
- HARDWAREGood: Dedicated design documentation is present.Good: A bill of materials is committed.Good: .gitignore present.
- ImagesGood: Schematic or diagram visuals are included.
- Lamoka1-DEV-Brain
- CONTRIBUTING.mdIssue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
- LICENSE-HARD
- LICENSE-SOFT
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Issue: No fabrication or ordering instructions in the README (−50 pts).Fix: Add a section on how to get the board made: export gerbers, order from a fab (JLCPCB, PCBWay, OSH Park), and use the BOM.Good: README explains how to assemble, wire up, or flash the hardware.
Add this badge to your README
It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.
[](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/bearjhartjen/lamoka1-project)