A well-known project done right. Strong docs and solid engineering throughout.

The official AWS SDK for Ruby

Documentation

95

Contributing guide5pt84

Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

README12pt100

README is present.

License6pt100

Licensed under Apache-2.0.

Engineering

78

Reproducibility6pt12

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

Commit Gemfile.lock so Bundler installs are repeatable.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (build_tools/aws-sdk-code-generator/lib/aws-sdk-code-generator/views/spec).

CI/CD14pt85

CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Ruby linting configured (.rubocop.yml).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 1,234
    Forks
  • 1000
    Releaseslatest 10y ago

Community

  • Community health
  • authors own >50% of commits
  • 3,657
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 6h
    Median issue response
  • 5d 2h
    Median PR merge time
  • 25
    Open issues
Repository files21 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
    Good: Dependabot configured for github-actions.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • apis
  • build_tools
    Good: Test files detected (build_tools/aws-sdk-code-generator/lib/aws-sdk-code-generator/views/spec).
  • doc-src
  • gems
  • tasks
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .gitmodules
  • .rubocop.yml
    Good: Ruby linting configured (.rubocop.yml).
  • .yardopts
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    Good: Code of conduct present.
  • CONTRIBUTING.md
    Good: Contributing guide is detailed and thorough.
    Good: Contributing guide includes setup/install instructions.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • Gemfile
    Good: Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).
  • LICENSE.txt
    Good: Licensed under Apache-2.0.
  • NOTICE.txt
  • Rakefile
  • rbs_collection.yaml
  • README.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
  • services.json
  • UPGRADING.md
  • V3_UPGRADING_GUIDE.md