77

/ 100

GradeC

Good shape overall. A few tweaks would push it into the top tier.

Top 36% of 5,156 graded repos

:gem: Ruby library for Appium

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

12 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Wire your tests to a documented command (e.g. a test script in your build config) so the suite is reproducible.

  2. 2
    README12pt

    Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.

  3. 3
    Install and run instructions9pt

    Add a section showing how to start or use the project.

  4. 4
    Install and run instructions9pt

    Add a .env.example listing all required environment variables so contributors know what to set up.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

53

License6pt0

No license detected.

Add a LICENSE file. Without one, nobody can legally use, copy, or contribute to your code.

Install and run instructions9pt45

README documents how to install the project.

Contributing guide5pt69

Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.

Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.

README12pt80

README is present.

Engineering

83

Reproducibility6pt20

No dependency lockfile found (−70 pts).

Commit Gemfile.lock so Bundler installs are repeatable.

Tests18pt80

Test files detected (test).

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (.github/workflows/functional-test.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Ruby linting configured (.rubocop.yml).

Issue and PR templates6pt100

Issue or PR templates present.

Project health

100

Dependency manifest6pt100

Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).

Repository metadata5pt100

Repository has a description.

Activity5pt100

Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).

Housekeeping3pt100

.gitignore present.

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 153
    Forks
  • 25
    Releaseslatest 9y ago

Community

  • 75% - Good
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 217
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • 1d 24h
    Median issue response
  • <1h
    Median PR merge time
  • 0
    Open issues
Repository files19 root entries
  • .github
    Good: CI is configured (.github/workflows/functional-test.yml).
    Good: Dependabot covers 2 ecosystems (bundler, github-actions). Dependencies stay current.
    Good: Issue or PR templates present.
  • android_tests
  • docs
  • grid
  • ios_tests
  • lib
  • test
    Good: Test files detected (test).
  • test_apps
  • .gitignore
    Good: .gitignore present.
  • .rubocop.yml
    Good: Ruby linting configured (.rubocop.yml).
  • appium_lib.gemspec
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • contributing.md
    Issue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.
    Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.
    Good: Contributing guide explains how to run tests.
    Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.
    Issue: Contributing guide has no code examples (−5 pts).Fix: Add code blocks showing example commands for setup, running tests, and submitting a PR.
  • Gemfile
    Good: Dependency manifest found (Gemfile).
  • LICENSE-2.0.txt
  • Rakefile
  • readme.md
    Good: README is present.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Issue: No screenshots or images in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Good: README includes status badges.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
  • release_notes.md
  • Thorfile
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/appium/ruby_lib)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/appium/ruby_lib)

More graded Ruby repos