Polished and well engineered. Punching above its star count.
functional/point-free utils for JavaScript
Outstanding. A score of 96/100 puts this repo in a very small tier of truly well-engineered projects.
Documentation
93
Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.
→ Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.
README documents how to install the project.
README is present.
Licensed under MIT.
Engineering
96
Lockfile present (bun.lock). Installs are reproducible.
Test files detected (test).
CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).
Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
Issue or PR templates present.
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (package.json).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 5Forks
- 11Releaseslatest 3d ago
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 100Watchers
Responsiveness
- 10hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 4Open issues
Repository files26 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/ci.yml).Good: Issue or PR templates present.
- apps
- scripts
- src
- testGood: Test files detected (test).
- .codeclimate.yml
- .editorconfigGood: Linter or formatter configured (.editorconfig).
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- .release-please-manifest.json
- AGENTS.md
- biome.json
- bun.lockGood: Lockfile present (bun.lock). Installs are reproducible.
- CHANGELOG.md
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdGood: Code of conduct present.
- CONTRIBUTING.mdIssue: Contributing guide is too short for full depth credit (−6 pts). 400+ words earns the full +12 pts.Fix: Add setup instructions, code style notes, and how to run tests.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a setup section (−12 pts).Fix: Show new contributors how to get a local dev environment running.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a code style section (−8 pts).Fix: Describe your linting/formatting rules and how to run them.Issue: Contributing guide lacks a testing section (−8 pts).Fix: Show contributors how to run the test suite (e.g. npm test, pytest, cargo test).Good: Contributing guide describes the PR/review workflow.Good: Contributing guide includes code examples.
- jsr.json
- LICENSEGood: Licensed under MIT.
- logo.png
- package.jsonGood: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Good: README has code examples.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Good: README includes status badges.Good: README documents how to install the project.Good: README documents how to run the project.
- release-please-config.json
- SECURITY.mdGood: Security policy present.
- SUPPORT.md
- tsconfig.json
- tsconfig.types.json
- tsdown.config.ts