Getting noticed, but rough fundamentals could turn visitors away.
This repo tracks the opened and merged PRs by the top SWE coding agents by OpenAI, GitHub, and others. Updates regularly.
Documentation
28
No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).
→ Add a section showing how to install dependencies.
No license detected.
→ Add a LICENSE file. Without one, nobody can legally use, copy, or contribute to your code.
No CONTRIBUTING.md found (−47 pts base + up to −53 pts more for content).
→ Add a CONTRIBUTING.md telling newcomers how to get involved. Include setup, code style, test, and PR instructions.
README is present.
Engineering
20
No tests detected anywhere in the repository.
→ Add automated tests. They prove the code works and give contributors confidence to make changes.
No linter or formatter config found.
→ Add a linter config such as .eslintrc.json, .prettierrc, ruff.toml, or .golangci.yml to enforce consistent code style.
No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).
→ Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.
CI is configured (.github/workflows/pr‑stats.yml).
Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.
Project health
100
Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).
Repository has a description.
Actively maintained (pushed within the last month).
.gitignore present.
Repository health signals
Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time
Activity
- —Commits (30d / 90d)
- 24Forks
- 1Releaseslatest 12mo ago
Community
- —Community health
- —authors own >50% of commits
- 301Watchers
Responsiveness
- 1d 11hMedian issue response
- <1hMedian PR merge time
- 10Open issues
Repository files12 root entries
- .githubGood: CI is configured (.github/workflows/pr‑stats.yml).
- docs
- scripts
- templates
- .gitignoreGood: .gitignore present.
- AGENTS.md
- collect_data.py
- data_backup.csv
- data.csv
- generate_chart.py
- README.mdGood: README is present.Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.Good: README includes screenshots or visuals. Great for first impressions.Issue: README has no code examples (−15 pts).Fix: Show a quick-start snippet so contributors can see what using your project looks like.Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.Issue: No install instructions found in the README (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to install dependencies.Issue: No run or usage instructions found (−45 pts).Fix: Add a section showing how to start or use the project.
- requirements.txtGood: Lockfile present (requirements.txt). Installs are reproducible.Good: Dependency manifest found (requirements.txt).