aatvel/earth
Grade a repo

0

/ 100

GradeD

Rough and inactive. Tests, CI, and a fuller README would revive it.

Higher than 44% of 5,156 graded repos

A low grade is a to-do list, not a judgment of your code

Most gaps here are documentation, tests, and setup, not the code itself. Closing your top 3 gaps alone would lift this repo to C (79).

See your top fixes
Now
D
60
Potential
C
79

Top fixes

Highest-impact changes first, ranked by point weight

16 to address
  1. 1
    Tests18pt

    Set scripts.test in package.json to your actual test command, e.g. "vitest" or "jest".

  2. 2
    README12pt

    Add an Overview, Install, Usage, and Contributing section at minimum.

  3. 3
    README12pt

    Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.

  4. 4
    README12pt

    Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.

Working through the fixes? Let every push regrade itself.

The free GitHub App rescans this repo on every push and posts the grade as a commit check, so the score climbs without coming back to rescan by hand.

Install the GitHub App

Scorecard

Every check, grouped by category and sorted worst-first

Documentation

75

README12pt50

README is present.

Contributing guide5pt77

CONTRIBUTING guide found.

Install and run instructions9pt90

README documents how to install the project.

License6pt100

A license file is present.

Engineering

61

Issue and PR templates6pt0

No issue or PR templates found (−100 pts).

Add .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ with bug_report.md and feature_request.md to guide contributors. It dramatically improves issue quality.

Tests18pt35

Test files detected (node_modules/@nodelib/fs.scandir/out/adapters/fs.spec.js).

Reproducibility6pt80

Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.

CI/CD14pt100

CI is configured (node_modules/acorn-node/.travis.yml).

Linting and formatting5pt100

Linter or formatter configured (node_modules/ajv/scripts/.eslintrc.yml).

Project health

32

Housekeeping3pt0

No .gitignore found (−60 pts).

Add a .gitignore to keep build output, node_modules, and secrets out of version control.

Activity5pt5

No pushes in over 2 years. Looks unmaintained (−95 pts).

A recent commit signals the project is alive and worth using.

Repository metadata5pt40

No repository description set on GitHub (−60 pts).

Add a one-line description in the repo Settings → About. It appears in search results and social previews.

Dependency manifest6pt65

Dependency manifest found (package.json).

Repository health signals

Activity, community, and responsiveness at scan time

Activity

  • -
    Commits (30d / 90d)
  • 0
    Forks
  • -
    Releases

Community

  • -
    Community health
  • -
    authors own >50% of commits
  • 1
    Watchers

Responsiveness

  • -
    Median issue response
  • -
    Median PR merge time
  • 0
    Open issues
Repository files8 root entries
  • bundler
  • dist
  • node_modules
    Good: A license file is present.
    Good: CONTRIBUTING guide found.
    Issue: CONTRIBUTING guide contents could not be read (−28 pts vs a readable file).Fix: Move the file to the repo root or docs/CONTRIBUTING.md so its setup, style, test, and PR sections can be graded.
    Good: Code of conduct present.
    Good: Test files detected (node_modules/@nodelib/fs.scandir/out/adapters/fs.spec.js).
    Good: CI is configured (node_modules/acorn-node/.travis.yml).
    Good: Linter or formatter configured (node_modules/ajv/scripts/.eslintrc.yml).
    Good: Environment pinned via node_modules/is-symbol/.nvmrc.
    Good: Security policy present.
    Issue: Build artifacts or local files may be committed (node_modules/.bin) (−40 pts).Fix: Remove them and add to .gitignore.
  • src
  • static
  • package-lock.json
    Good: Lockfile present (package-lock.json). Installs are reproducible.
  • package.json
    Good: Dependency manifest found (package.json).
  • readme.md
    Good: README is present.
    Issue: README is very short (−20 pts). 400+ characters earns +10 pts; 1,500+ earns +20 pts.Fix: Add an Overview, Install, Usage, and Contributing section at minimum.
    Good: README is well structured with multiple sections.
    Issue: No screenshots or images in the README (−20 pts).Fix: Add a GIF, screenshot, or logo image. It is the fastest way to show what your project does.
    Good: README has code examples.
    Good: README links to a live demo or deployed app.
    Issue: No status badges in the README (−10 pts).Fix: Add CI/build status badges from shields.io or your CI provider to signal project health.
    Good: README documents how to install the project.
    Good: README documents how to run the project.
RepoGrade badge preview

Add this badge to your README

It updates automatically each time the repo is re-graded.

[![RepoGrade](https://www.repo-grade.com/api/badge/aatvel/earth)](https://www.repo-grade.com/report/aatvel/earth)

More graded CSS repos